# AIActEasy — full text > AIActEasy scans a website, detects the tools it runs, and maps each one to its EU AI Act Article 50 transparency obligations — so a company can see which of its AI touchpoints need a disclosure now that the 2 August 2026 deadline has passed. This file concatenates every published English guide and tool page. --- # Is Crisp EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-crisp-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Crisp EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Crisp use AI? Crisp ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Crisp, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Crisp use AI?** Yes — Crisp ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Crisp create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Freshchat EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-freshchat-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Freshchat EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Freshchat use AI? Freshchat ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Freshchat, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Freshchat use AI?** Yes — Freshchat ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Freshchat create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is LivePerson EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-liveperson-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is LivePerson EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does LivePerson use AI? LivePerson ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for LivePerson, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does LivePerson use AI?** Yes — LivePerson ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does LivePerson create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Tidio EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-tidio-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Tidio EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Tidio use AI? Tidio ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Tidio, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Tidio use AI?** Yes — Tidio ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Tidio create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Zendesk AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-zendesk-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Zendesk AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Zendesk AI use AI? Zendesk AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Zendesk AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Zendesk AI use AI?** Yes — Zendesk AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Zendesk AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Ada EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-ada-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Ada EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Ada use AI? Ada ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Ada, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Ada use AI?** Yes — Ada ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Ada create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Drift EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-drift-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Drift EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Drift use AI? Drift ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Drift, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Drift use AI?** Yes — Drift ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Drift create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Intercom EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-intercom-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Intercom EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Intercom use AI? Intercom ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Intercom, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Intercom use AI?** Yes — Intercom ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Intercom create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is LiveChat EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-livechat-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is LiveChat EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does LiveChat use AI? LiveChat ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for LiveChat, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does LiveChat use AI?** Yes — LiveChat ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does LiveChat create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Tawk.to EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-tawk-to-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Tawk.to EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Tawk.to use AI? Tawk.to ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Tawk.to, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Tawk.to use AI?** Yes — Tawk.to ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Tawk.to create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Kustomer EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-kustomer-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Kustomer EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Kustomer use AI? Kustomer ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Kustomer, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Kustomer use AI?** Yes — Kustomer ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Kustomer create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is ManyChat EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-manychat-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is ManyChat EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does ManyChat use AI? ManyChat ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for ManyChat, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does ManyChat use AI?** Yes — ManyChat ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does ManyChat create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Landbot EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-landbot-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Landbot EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Landbot use AI? Landbot ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Landbot, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Landbot use AI?** Yes — Landbot ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Landbot create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Forethought EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-forethought-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Forethought EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Forethought use AI? Forethought ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Forethought, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Forethought use AI?** Yes — Forethought ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Forethought create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Gorgias EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-gorgias-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Gorgias EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Gorgias use AI? Gorgias ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Gorgias, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Gorgias use AI?** Yes — Gorgias ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Gorgias create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Helpshift EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-helpshift-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Helpshift EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Helpshift use AI? Helpshift ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Helpshift, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Helpshift use AI?** Yes — Helpshift ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Helpshift create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Ultimate.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-ultimate-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Ultimate.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Ultimate.ai use AI? Ultimate.ai ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Ultimate.ai, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Ultimate.ai use AI?** Yes — Ultimate.ai ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Ultimate.ai create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Cognigy EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-cognigy-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Cognigy EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Cognigy use AI? Cognigy ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Cognigy, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Cognigy use AI?** Yes — Cognigy ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Cognigy create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Yellow.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-yellow-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Yellow.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Yellow.ai use AI? Yellow.ai ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Yellow.ai, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Yellow.ai use AI?** Yes — Yellow.ai ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Yellow.ai create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Haptik EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-haptik-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Haptik EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Haptik use AI? Haptik ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Haptik, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Haptik use AI?** Yes — Haptik ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Haptik create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Kore.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-kore-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Kore.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Kore.ai use AI? Kore.ai ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Kore.ai, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Kore.ai use AI?** Yes — Kore.ai ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Kore.ai create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Rasa EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-rasa-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Rasa EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Rasa use AI? Rasa ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Rasa, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Rasa use AI?** Yes — Rasa ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Rasa create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Botpress EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-botpress-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Botpress EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Botpress use AI? Botpress ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Botpress, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Botpress use AI?** Yes — Botpress ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Botpress create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Dialogflow EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-dialogflow-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Dialogflow EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Dialogflow use AI? Dialogflow ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Dialogflow, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Dialogflow use AI?** Yes — Dialogflow ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Dialogflow create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is watsonx Assistant EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-watsonx-assistant-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is watsonx Assistant EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does watsonx Assistant use AI? watsonx Assistant ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for watsonx Assistant, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does watsonx Assistant use AI?** Yes — watsonx Assistant ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does watsonx Assistant create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Amazon Lex EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-amazon-lex-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Amazon Lex EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Amazon Lex use AI? Amazon Lex ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Amazon Lex, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Amazon Lex use AI?** Yes — Amazon Lex ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Amazon Lex create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Copilot Studio EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-copilot-studio-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Copilot Studio EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Copilot Studio use AI? Copilot Studio ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Copilot Studio, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Copilot Studio use AI?** Yes — Copilot Studio ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Copilot Studio create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Voiceflow EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-voiceflow-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Voiceflow EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Voiceflow use AI? Voiceflow ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Voiceflow, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Voiceflow use AI?** Yes — Voiceflow ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Voiceflow create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Fin by Intercom EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-fin-by-intercom-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Fin by Intercom EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Fin by Intercom use AI? Fin by Intercom ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Fin by Intercom, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Fin by Intercom use AI?** Yes — Fin by Intercom ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Fin by Intercom create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Chatbase EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-chatbase-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Chatbase EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Chatbase use AI? Chatbase ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Chatbase, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Chatbase use AI?** Yes — Chatbase ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Chatbase create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Sendbird EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-sendbird-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Sendbird EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Sendbird use AI? Sendbird ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Sendbird, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Sendbird use AI?** Yes — Sendbird ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Sendbird create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Gladly EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-gladly-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Gladly EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Gladly use AI? Gladly ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Gladly, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Gladly use AI?** Yes — Gladly ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Gladly create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Aisera EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-aisera-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Aisera EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Aisera use AI? Aisera ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Aisera, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Aisera use AI?** Yes — Aisera ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Aisera create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Moveworks EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-moveworks-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Moveworks EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Moveworks use AI? Moveworks ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Moveworks, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Moveworks use AI?** Yes — Moveworks ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Moveworks create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is DevRev EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-devrev-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is DevRev EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does DevRev use AI? DevRev ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for DevRev, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does DevRev use AI?** Yes — DevRev ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does DevRev create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Espressive EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-espressive-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Espressive EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Espressive use AI? Espressive ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Espressive, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Espressive use AI?** Yes — Espressive ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Espressive create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Sierra EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-sierra-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Sierra EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Sierra use AI? Sierra ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Sierra, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Sierra use AI?** Yes — Sierra ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Sierra create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Decagon EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-decagon-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Decagon EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Decagon use AI? Decagon ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Decagon, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Decagon use AI?** Yes — Decagon ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Decagon create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Conversica EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-conversica-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Conversica EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Conversica use AI? Conversica ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Conversica, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Conversica use AI?** Yes — Conversica ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Conversica create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Engati EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-engati-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Engati EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Engati use AI? Engati ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Engati, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Engati use AI?** Yes — Engati ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Engati create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Wati EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-wati-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Wati EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Wati use AI? Wati ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Wati, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Wati use AI?** Yes — Wati ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Wati create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Tars EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-tars-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Tars EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Tars use AI? Tars ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Tars, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Tars use AI?** Yes — Tars ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Tars create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Chatfuel EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-chatfuel-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Chatfuel EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Chatfuel use AI? Chatfuel ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Chatfuel, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Chatfuel use AI?** Yes — Chatfuel ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Chatfuel create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Flow XO EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-flow-xo-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Flow XO EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Flow XO use AI? Flow XO ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Flow XO, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Flow XO use AI?** Yes — Flow XO ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Flow XO create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Pandorabots EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-pandorabots-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Pandorabots EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Pandorabots use AI? Pandorabots ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Pandorabots, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Pandorabots use AI?** Yes — Pandorabots ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Pandorabots create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Verloop EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-verloop-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Verloop EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Verloop use AI? Verloop ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Verloop, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Verloop use AI?** Yes — Verloop ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Verloop create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Certainly EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-certainly-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Certainly EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Certainly use AI? Certainly ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Certainly, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Certainly use AI?** Yes — Certainly ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Certainly create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Quiq EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-quiq-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Quiq EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Quiq use AI? Quiq ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Quiq, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Quiq use AI?** Yes — Quiq ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Quiq create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear and accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency gap by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Jasper EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-jasper-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Jasper EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Jasper use AI? Jasper ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic content and mark it machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic content = Art.50 violation; deepfake/public-interest text needs labels. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Jasper, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Jasper use AI?** Yes — Jasper ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Jasper create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic content and mark it machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic content = Art.50 violation; deepfake/public-interest text needs labels. --- # Is Copy.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-copy-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Copy.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Copy.ai use AI? Copy.ai ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic content and mark it machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic content = Art.50 violation; deepfake/public-interest text needs labels. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Copy.ai, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Copy.ai use AI?** Yes — Copy.ai ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Copy.ai create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic content and mark it machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic content = Art.50 violation; deepfake/public-interest text needs labels. --- # Is Writesonic EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-writesonic-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Writesonic EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Writesonic use AI? Writesonic ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic content and mark it machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic content = Art.50 violation; deepfake/public-interest text needs labels. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Writesonic, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Writesonic use AI?** Yes — Writesonic ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Writesonic create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic content and mark it machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic content = Art.50 violation; deepfake/public-interest text needs labels. --- # Is Rytr EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-rytr-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Rytr EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Rytr use AI? Rytr ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Rytr, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Rytr use AI?** Yes — Rytr ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Rytr create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Anyword EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-anyword-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Anyword EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Anyword use AI? Anyword ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Anyword, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Anyword use AI?** Yes — Anyword ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Anyword create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Sudowrite EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-sudowrite-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Sudowrite EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Sudowrite use AI? Sudowrite ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Sudowrite, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Sudowrite use AI?** Yes — Sudowrite ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Sudowrite create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Notion AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-notion-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Notion AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Notion AI use AI? Notion AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Notion AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Notion AI use AI?** Yes — Notion AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Notion AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Grammarly EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-grammarly-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Grammarly EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Grammarly use AI? Grammarly ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Grammarly, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Grammarly use AI?** Yes — Grammarly ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Grammarly create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Wordtune EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-wordtune-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Wordtune EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Wordtune use AI? Wordtune ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Wordtune, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Wordtune use AI?** Yes — Wordtune ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Wordtune create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Frase EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-frase-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Frase EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Frase use AI? Frase ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Frase, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Frase use AI?** Yes — Frase ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Frase create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Surfer AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-surfer-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Surfer AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Surfer AI use AI? Surfer AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Surfer AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Surfer AI use AI?** Yes — Surfer AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Surfer AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Scalenut EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-scalenut-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Scalenut EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Scalenut use AI? Scalenut ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Scalenut, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Scalenut use AI?** Yes — Scalenut ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Scalenut create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Peppertype EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-peppertype-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Peppertype EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Peppertype use AI? Peppertype ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Peppertype, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Peppertype use AI?** Yes — Peppertype ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Peppertype create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Hypotenuse AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-hypotenuse-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Hypotenuse AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Hypotenuse AI use AI? Hypotenuse AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Hypotenuse AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Hypotenuse AI use AI?** Yes — Hypotenuse AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Hypotenuse AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is ContentBot EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-contentbot-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is ContentBot EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does ContentBot use AI? ContentBot ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for ContentBot, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does ContentBot use AI?** Yes — ContentBot ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does ContentBot create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Neuroflash EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-neuroflash-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Neuroflash EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Neuroflash use AI? Neuroflash ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Neuroflash, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Neuroflash use AI?** Yes — Neuroflash ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Neuroflash create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Writer EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-writer-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Writer EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Writer use AI? Writer ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Writer, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Writer use AI?** Yes — Writer ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Writer create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Jenni AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-jenni-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Jenni AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Jenni AI use AI? Jenni AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Jenni AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Jenni AI use AI?** Yes — Jenni AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Jenni AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is QuillBot EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-quillbot-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is QuillBot EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does QuillBot use AI? QuillBot ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for QuillBot, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does QuillBot use AI?** Yes — QuillBot ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does QuillBot create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Simplified EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-simplified-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Simplified EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Simplified use AI? Simplified ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Simplified, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Simplified use AI?** Yes — Simplified ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Simplified create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Copysmith EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-copysmith-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Copysmith EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Copysmith use AI? Copysmith ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Copysmith, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Copysmith use AI?** Yes — Copysmith ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Copysmith create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Article Forge EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-article-forge-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Article Forge EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Article Forge use AI? Article Forge ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Article Forge, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Article Forge use AI?** Yes — Article Forge ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Article Forge create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is GrowthBar EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-growthbar-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is GrowthBar EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does GrowthBar use AI? GrowthBar ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for GrowthBar, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does GrowthBar use AI?** Yes — GrowthBar ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does GrowthBar create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Outranking EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-outranking-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Outranking EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Outranking use AI? Outranking ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Outranking, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Outranking use AI?** Yes — Outranking ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Outranking create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Writecream EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-writecream-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Writecream EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Writecream use AI? Writecream ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Writecream, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Writecream use AI?** Yes — Writecream ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Writecream create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is TextCortex EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-textcortex-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is TextCortex EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does TextCortex use AI? TextCortex ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for TextCortex, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does TextCortex use AI?** Yes — TextCortex ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does TextCortex create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Compose AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-compose-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Compose AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Compose AI use AI? Compose AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Compose AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Compose AI use AI?** Yes — Compose AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Compose AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Lavender EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-lavender-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Lavender EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Lavender use AI? Lavender ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Lavender, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Lavender use AI?** Yes — Lavender ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Lavender create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic text and keep it machine-readable where required (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled AI-generated content can breach Art.50(2); public-interest text needs disclosure. --- # Is Midjourney EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-midjourney-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Midjourney EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Midjourney use AI? Midjourney ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Midjourney, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Midjourney use AI?** Yes — Midjourney ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Midjourney create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is DALL-E EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-dall-e-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is DALL-E EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does DALL-E use AI? DALL-E ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for DALL-E, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does DALL-E use AI?** Yes — DALL-E ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does DALL-E create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Stable Diffusion EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-stable-diffusion-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Stable Diffusion EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Stable Diffusion use AI? Stable Diffusion ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Stable Diffusion, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Stable Diffusion use AI?** Yes — Stable Diffusion ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Stable Diffusion create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Adobe Firefly EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-adobe-firefly-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Adobe Firefly EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Adobe Firefly use AI? Adobe Firefly ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Adobe Firefly, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Adobe Firefly use AI?** Yes — Adobe Firefly ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Adobe Firefly create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Leonardo.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-leonardo-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Leonardo.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Leonardo.ai use AI? Leonardo.ai ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Leonardo.ai, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Leonardo.ai use AI?** Yes — Leonardo.ai ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Leonardo.ai create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Fotor AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-fotor-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Fotor AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Fotor AI use AI? Fotor AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Fotor AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Fotor AI use AI?** Yes — Fotor AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Fotor AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Canva Magic Studio EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-canva-magic-studio-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Canva Magic Studio EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Canva Magic Studio use AI? Canva Magic Studio ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Canva Magic Studio, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Canva Magic Studio use AI?** Yes — Canva Magic Studio ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Canva Magic Studio create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Runway EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-runway-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Runway EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Runway use AI? Runway ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Runway, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Runway use AI?** Yes — Runway ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Runway create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Pika EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-pika-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Pika EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Pika use AI? Pika ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Pika, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Pika use AI?** Yes — Pika ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Pika create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Kaiber EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-kaiber-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Kaiber EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Kaiber use AI? Kaiber ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Kaiber, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Kaiber use AI?** Yes — Kaiber ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Kaiber create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Ideogram EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-ideogram-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Ideogram EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Ideogram use AI? Ideogram ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Ideogram, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Ideogram use AI?** Yes — Ideogram ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Ideogram create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Playground AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-playground-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Playground AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Playground AI use AI? Playground AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Playground AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Playground AI use AI?** Yes — Playground AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Playground AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Recraft EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-recraft-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Recraft EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Recraft use AI? Recraft ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Recraft, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Recraft use AI?** Yes — Recraft ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Recraft create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Krea EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-krea-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Krea EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Krea use AI? Krea ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Krea, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Krea use AI?** Yes — Krea ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Krea create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Flux EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-flux-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Flux EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Flux use AI? Flux ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Flux, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Flux use AI?** Yes — Flux ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Flux create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Imagen EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-imagen-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Imagen EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Imagen use AI? Imagen ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Imagen, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Imagen use AI?** Yes — Imagen ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Imagen create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Luma Dream Machine EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-luma-dream-machine-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Luma Dream Machine EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Luma Dream Machine use AI? Luma Dream Machine ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Luma Dream Machine, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Luma Dream Machine use AI?** Yes — Luma Dream Machine ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Luma Dream Machine create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is NightCafe EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-nightcafe-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is NightCafe EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does NightCafe use AI? NightCafe ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for NightCafe, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does NightCafe use AI?** Yes — NightCafe ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does NightCafe create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Lexica EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-lexica-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Lexica EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Lexica use AI? Lexica ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Lexica, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Lexica use AI?** Yes — Lexica ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Lexica create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Dream by WOMBO EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-dream-by-wombo-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Dream by WOMBO EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Dream by WOMBO use AI? Dream by WOMBO ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Dream by WOMBO, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Dream by WOMBO use AI?** Yes — Dream by WOMBO ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Dream by WOMBO create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is StarryAI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-starryai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is StarryAI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does StarryAI use AI? StarryAI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for StarryAI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does StarryAI use AI?** Yes — StarryAI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does StarryAI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Picsart AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-picsart-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Picsart AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Picsart AI use AI? Picsart AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Picsart AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Picsart AI use AI?** Yes — Picsart AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Picsart AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Artbreeder EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-artbreeder-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Artbreeder EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Artbreeder use AI? Artbreeder ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Artbreeder, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Artbreeder use AI?** Yes — Artbreeder ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Artbreeder create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Pictory EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-pictory-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Pictory EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Pictory use AI? Pictory ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Pictory, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Pictory use AI?** Yes — Pictory ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Pictory create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is Veed AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-veed-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Veed AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Veed AI use AI? Veed AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Veed AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Veed AI use AI?** Yes — Veed AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Veed AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Mark AI-generated images/audio/video as artificially generated, machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic media = Art.50(2) gap; deep-fakes additionally need Art.50(4) disclosure. --- # Is ElevenLabs EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-elevenlabs-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is ElevenLabs EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does ElevenLabs use AI? ElevenLabs ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for ElevenLabs, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does ElevenLabs use AI?** Yes — ElevenLabs ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does ElevenLabs create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. --- # Is Murf EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-murf-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Murf EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Murf use AI? Murf ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Murf, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Murf use AI?** Yes — Murf ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Murf create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. --- # Is Play.ht EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-play-ht-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Play.ht EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Play.ht use AI? Play.ht ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Play.ht, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Play.ht use AI?** Yes — Play.ht ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Play.ht create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. --- # Is Resemble AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-resemble-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Resemble AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Resemble AI use AI? Resemble AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Resemble AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Resemble AI use AI?** Yes — Resemble AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Resemble AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. --- # Is WellSaid Labs EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-wellsaid-labs-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is WellSaid Labs EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does WellSaid Labs use AI? WellSaid Labs ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for WellSaid Labs, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does WellSaid Labs use AI?** Yes — WellSaid Labs ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does WellSaid Labs create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. --- # Is Speechify EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-speechify-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Speechify EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Speechify use AI? Speechify ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Speechify, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Speechify use AI?** Yes — Speechify ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Speechify create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. --- # Is LOVO EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-lovo-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is LOVO EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does LOVO use AI? LOVO ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for LOVO, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does LOVO use AI?** Yes — LOVO ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does LOVO create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. --- # Is Voicemod EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-voicemod-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Voicemod EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Voicemod use AI? Voicemod ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Voicemod, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Voicemod use AI?** Yes — Voicemod ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Voicemod create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. --- # Is Podcastle EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-podcastle-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Podcastle EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Podcastle use AI? Podcastle ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Podcastle, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Podcastle use AI?** Yes — Podcastle ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Podcastle create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. --- # Is Listnr EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-listnr-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Listnr EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Listnr use AI? Listnr ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Listnr, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Listnr use AI?** Yes — Listnr ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Listnr create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. --- # Is Replica Studios EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-replica-studios-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Replica Studios EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Replica Studios use AI? Replica Studios ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Replica Studios, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Replica Studios use AI?** Yes — Replica Studios ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Replica Studios create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. --- # Is Descript Overdub EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-descript-overdub-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Descript Overdub EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Descript Overdub use AI? Descript Overdub ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Descript Overdub, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Descript Overdub use AI?** Yes — Descript Overdub ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Descript Overdub create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated or cloned voice as synthetic (Art.50(2)); disclose AI interaction if conversational (Art.50(1)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Synthetic voice without disclosure can breach Art.50; voice cloning carries extra consent/IP risk. --- # Is Synthesia EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-synthesia-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Synthesia EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Synthesia use AI? Synthesia ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic content and mark it machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic content = Art.50 violation; deepfake/public-interest text needs labels. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Synthesia, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Synthesia use AI?** Yes — Synthesia ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Synthesia create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic content and mark it machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic content = Art.50 violation; deepfake/public-interest text needs labels. --- # Is HeyGen EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-heygen-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is HeyGen EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does HeyGen use AI? HeyGen ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(4) requires that deep-fake and certain AI-generated public-interest content be disclosed as artificially generated or manipulated. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for HeyGen, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does HeyGen use AI?** Yes — HeyGen ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does HeyGen create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. --- # Is D-ID EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-d-id-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is D-ID EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does D-ID use AI? D-ID ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(4) requires that deep-fake and certain AI-generated public-interest content be disclosed as artificially generated or manipulated. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for D-ID, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does D-ID use AI?** Yes — D-ID ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does D-ID create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. --- # Is Colossyan EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-colossyan-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Colossyan EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Colossyan use AI? Colossyan ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(4) requires that deep-fake and certain AI-generated public-interest content be disclosed as artificially generated or manipulated. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Colossyan, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Colossyan use AI?** Yes — Colossyan ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Colossyan create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. --- # Is Hour One EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-hour-one-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Hour One EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Hour One use AI? Hour One ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(4) requires that deep-fake and certain AI-generated public-interest content be disclosed as artificially generated or manipulated. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Hour One, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Hour One use AI?** Yes — Hour One ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Hour One create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. --- # Is Synthesys EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-synthesys-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Synthesys EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Synthesys use AI? Synthesys ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(4) requires that deep-fake and certain AI-generated public-interest content be disclosed as artificially generated or manipulated. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Synthesys, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Synthesys use AI?** Yes — Synthesys ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Synthesys create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. --- # Is DeepBrain AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-deepbrain-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is DeepBrain AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does DeepBrain AI use AI? DeepBrain AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(4) requires that deep-fake and certain AI-generated public-interest content be disclosed as artificially generated or manipulated. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for DeepBrain AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does DeepBrain AI use AI?** Yes — DeepBrain AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does DeepBrain AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. --- # Is Rephrase.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-rephrase-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Rephrase.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Rephrase.ai use AI? Rephrase.ai ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(4) requires that deep-fake and certain AI-generated public-interest content be disclosed as artificially generated or manipulated. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Rephrase.ai, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Rephrase.ai use AI?** Yes — Rephrase.ai ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Rephrase.ai create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. --- # Is Elai.io EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-elai-io-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Elai.io EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Elai.io use AI? Elai.io ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(4) requires that deep-fake and certain AI-generated public-interest content be disclosed as artificially generated or manipulated. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Elai.io, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Elai.io use AI?** Yes — Elai.io ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Elai.io create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. --- # Is Movio EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-movio-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Movio EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Movio use AI? Movio ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(4) requires that deep-fake and certain AI-generated public-interest content be disclosed as artificially generated or manipulated. **Your likely obligation:** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Movio, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Movio use AI?** Yes — Movio ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Movio create an EU AI Act obligation?** Disclose AI-generated avatars / deep-fake video as artificially generated (Art.50(4)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed synthetic presenters/deep-fakes = Art.50(4) violation by 2 Aug 2026. --- # Is Affectiva EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-affectiva-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Affectiva EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Affectiva use AI? Affectiva ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(3) requires that people exposed to emotion-recognition or biometric-categorisation systems be informed of that fact. **Your likely obligation:** Inform people exposed to emotion-recognition / biometric-categorisation systems (Art.50(3)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed emotion/biometric inference = Art.50(3) gap and likely GDPR exposure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Affectiva, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Affectiva use AI?** Yes — Affectiva ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Affectiva create an EU AI Act obligation?** Inform people exposed to emotion-recognition / biometric-categorisation systems (Art.50(3)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed emotion/biometric inference = Art.50(3) gap and likely GDPR exposure. --- # Is Realeyes EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-realeyes-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Realeyes EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Realeyes use AI? Realeyes ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(3) requires that people exposed to emotion-recognition or biometric-categorisation systems be informed of that fact. **Your likely obligation:** Inform people exposed to emotion-recognition / biometric-categorisation systems (Art.50(3)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed emotion/biometric inference = Art.50(3) gap and likely GDPR exposure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Realeyes, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Realeyes use AI?** Yes — Realeyes ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Realeyes create an EU AI Act obligation?** Inform people exposed to emotion-recognition / biometric-categorisation systems (Art.50(3)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed emotion/biometric inference = Art.50(3) gap and likely GDPR exposure. --- # Is Hume AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-hume-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Hume AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Hume AI use AI? Hume AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(3) requires that people exposed to emotion-recognition or biometric-categorisation systems be informed of that fact. **Your likely obligation:** Inform people exposed to emotion-recognition / biometric-categorisation systems (Art.50(3)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed emotion/biometric inference = Art.50(3) gap and likely GDPR exposure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Hume AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Hume AI use AI?** Yes — Hume AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Hume AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Inform people exposed to emotion-recognition / biometric-categorisation systems (Art.50(3)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed emotion/biometric inference = Art.50(3) gap and likely GDPR exposure. --- # Is Smart Eye EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-smart-eye-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Smart Eye EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Smart Eye use AI? Smart Eye ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(3) requires that people exposed to emotion-recognition or biometric-categorisation systems be informed of that fact. **Your likely obligation:** Inform people exposed to emotion-recognition / biometric-categorisation systems (Art.50(3)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed emotion/biometric inference = Art.50(3) gap and likely GDPR exposure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Smart Eye, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Smart Eye use AI?** Yes — Smart Eye ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Smart Eye create an EU AI Act obligation?** Inform people exposed to emotion-recognition / biometric-categorisation systems (Art.50(3)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed emotion/biometric inference = Art.50(3) gap and likely GDPR exposure. --- # Is MorphCast EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-morphcast-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is MorphCast EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does MorphCast use AI? MorphCast ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(3) requires that people exposed to emotion-recognition or biometric-categorisation systems be informed of that fact. **Your likely obligation:** Inform people exposed to emotion-recognition / biometric-categorisation systems (Art.50(3)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed emotion/biometric inference = Art.50(3) gap and likely GDPR exposure. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for MorphCast, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does MorphCast use AI?** Yes — MorphCast ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does MorphCast create an EU AI Act obligation?** Inform people exposed to emotion-recognition / biometric-categorisation systems (Art.50(3)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed emotion/biometric inference = Art.50(3) gap and likely GDPR exposure. --- # Is Algolia EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-algolia-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Algolia EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Algolia use AI? Algolia ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger, but log it in your inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this technology alone. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Algolia, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Algolia use AI?** Yes — Algolia ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Algolia create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger, but log it in your inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this technology alone. --- # Is Coveo EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-coveo-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Coveo EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Coveo use AI? Coveo ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Coveo, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Coveo use AI?** Yes — Coveo ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Coveo create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. --- # Is Lucidworks EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-lucidworks-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Lucidworks EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Lucidworks use AI? Lucidworks ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Lucidworks, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Lucidworks use AI?** Yes — Lucidworks ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Lucidworks create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. --- # Is Constructor EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-constructor-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Constructor EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Constructor use AI? Constructor ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Constructor, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Constructor use AI?** Yes — Constructor ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Constructor create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. --- # Is Bloomreach EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-bloomreach-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Bloomreach EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Bloomreach use AI? Bloomreach ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Bloomreach, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Bloomreach use AI?** Yes — Bloomreach ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Bloomreach create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. --- # Is Klevu EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-klevu-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Klevu EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Klevu use AI? Klevu ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Klevu, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Klevu use AI?** Yes — Klevu ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Klevu create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. --- # Is Searchspring EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-searchspring-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Searchspring EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Searchspring use AI? Searchspring ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Searchspring, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Searchspring use AI?** Yes — Searchspring ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Searchspring create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. --- # Is Nosto EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-nosto-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Nosto EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Nosto use AI? Nosto ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Nosto, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Nosto use AI?** Yes — Nosto ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Nosto create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. --- # Is Dynamic Yield EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-dynamic-yield-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Dynamic Yield EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Dynamic Yield use AI? Dynamic Yield ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Dynamic Yield, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Dynamic Yield use AI?** Yes — Dynamic Yield ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Dynamic Yield create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. --- # Is Recombee EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-recombee-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Recombee EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Recombee use AI? Recombee ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Recombee, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Recombee use AI?** Yes — Recombee ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Recombee create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. --- # Is Vue.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-vue-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Vue.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Vue.ai use AI? Vue.ai ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Vue.ai, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Vue.ai use AI?** Yes — Vue.ai ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Vue.ai create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI search/recommender — no Art.50 transparency trigger on its own, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this alone; still inventory it to prove your reasoning. --- # Is Clearbit EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-clearbit-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Clearbit EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Clearbit use AI? Clearbit ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI enrichment — check data-protection basis; no Art.50 transparency trigger. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this technology alone. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Clearbit, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Clearbit use AI?** Yes — Clearbit ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Clearbit create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI enrichment — check data-protection basis; no Art.50 transparency trigger. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this technology alone. --- # Is 6sense EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-6sense-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is 6sense EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does 6sense use AI? 6sense ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for 6sense, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does 6sense use AI?** Yes — 6sense ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does 6sense create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. --- # Is People.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-people-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is People.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does People.ai use AI? People.ai ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for People.ai, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does People.ai use AI?** Yes — People.ai ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does People.ai create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. --- # Is Gong EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-gong-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Gong EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Gong use AI? Gong ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Gong, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Gong use AI?** Yes — Gong ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Gong create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. --- # Is Chorus.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-chorus-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Chorus.ai EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Chorus.ai use AI? Chorus.ai ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Chorus.ai, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Chorus.ai use AI?** Yes — Chorus.ai ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Chorus.ai create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. --- # Is Mutiny EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-mutiny-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Mutiny EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Mutiny use AI? Mutiny ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Mutiny, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Mutiny use AI?** Yes — Mutiny ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Mutiny create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. --- # Is Pecan AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-pecan-ai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Pecan AI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Pecan AI use AI? Pecan AI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Pecan AI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Pecan AI use AI?** Yes — Pecan AI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Pecan AI create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. --- # Is Akkio EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-akkio-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Akkio EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Akkio use AI? Akkio ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Akkio, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Akkio use AI?** Yes — Akkio ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Akkio create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI enrichment/analytics — no Art.50 transparency trigger; check the data-protection basis and inventory it. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No Art.50 trigger; data-protection and accuracy obligations may still apply. --- # Is GitHub Copilot EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-github-copilot-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is GitHub Copilot EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does GitHub Copilot use AI? GitHub Copilot ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for GitHub Copilot, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does GitHub Copilot use AI?** Yes — GitHub Copilot ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does GitHub Copilot create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. --- # Is Tabnine EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-tabnine-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Tabnine EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Tabnine use AI? Tabnine ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Tabnine, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Tabnine use AI?** Yes — Tabnine ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Tabnine create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. --- # Is Codeium EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-codeium-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Codeium EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Codeium use AI? Codeium ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Codeium, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Codeium use AI?** Yes — Codeium ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Codeium create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. --- # Is CodeWhisperer EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-codewhisperer-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is CodeWhisperer EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does CodeWhisperer use AI? CodeWhisperer ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for CodeWhisperer, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does CodeWhisperer use AI?** Yes — CodeWhisperer ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does CodeWhisperer create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. --- # Is Replit Ghostwriter EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-replit-ghostwriter-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Replit Ghostwriter EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Replit Ghostwriter use AI? Replit Ghostwriter ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Replit Ghostwriter, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Replit Ghostwriter use AI?** Yes — Replit Ghostwriter ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Replit Ghostwriter create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. --- # Is Sourcegraph Cody EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-sourcegraph-cody-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Sourcegraph Cody EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Sourcegraph Cody use AI? Sourcegraph Cody ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Sourcegraph Cody, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Sourcegraph Cody use AI?** Yes — Sourcegraph Cody ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Sourcegraph Cody create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. --- # Is Cursor EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-cursor-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Cursor EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Cursor use AI? Cursor ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Cursor, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Cursor use AI?** Yes — Cursor ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Cursor create an EU AI Act obligation?** AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code. --- # Is Zendesk EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-zendesk-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Zendesk EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Zendesk use AI? Zendesk ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Zendesk, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Zendesk use AI?** Yes — Zendesk ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Zendesk create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is HubSpot EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-hubspot-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is HubSpot EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does HubSpot use AI? HubSpot ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for HubSpot, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does HubSpot use AI?** Yes — HubSpot ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does HubSpot create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Salesforce Einstein EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-salesforce-einstein-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Salesforce Einstein EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Salesforce Einstein use AI? Salesforce Einstein ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(1) requires that people are told when they are interacting with an AI system, unless that is already obvious from the context. **Your likely obligation:** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Salesforce Einstein, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Salesforce Einstein use AI?** Yes — Salesforce Einstein ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Salesforce Einstein create an EU AI Act obligation?** Tell users they're interacting with an AI at first contact (Art.50(1)) — clear, accessible (WCAG). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Undisclosed AI chat = Art.50 transparency violation by 2 Aug 2026; weak answer to "prove compliance" in procurement. --- # Is Descript EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-descript-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Descript EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Descript use AI? Descript ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic content and mark it machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic content = Art.50 violation; deepfake/public-interest text needs labels. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Descript, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Descript use AI?** Yes — Descript ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does Descript create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic content and mark it machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic content = Art.50 violation; deepfake/public-interest text needs labels. --- # Is OpenAI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-openai-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is OpenAI EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does OpenAI use AI? OpenAI ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? Article 50(2) requires that AI-generated or AI-manipulated content be marked as artificial in a machine-readable format. **Your likely obligation:** Label AI-generated/synthetic content and mark it machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? Unlabelled synthetic content = Art.50 violation; deepfake/public-interest text needs labels. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for OpenAI, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does OpenAI use AI?** Yes — OpenAI ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope. **Does OpenAI create an EU AI Act obligation?** Label AI-generated/synthetic content and mark it machine-readable (Art.50(2)). **What is the risk if I ignore it?** Unlabelled synthetic content = Art.50 violation; deepfake/public-interest text needs labels. --- # Is Hotjar EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-hotjar-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Hotjar EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Hotjar use AI? Hotjar is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. Record it in your inventory anyway so you can show your reasoning. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this technology alone. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Hotjar, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Hotjar use AI?** Hotjar is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. **Does Hotjar create an EU AI Act obligation?** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this technology alone. --- # Is Google Analytics EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-google-analytics-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Google Analytics EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Google Analytics use AI? Google Analytics is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. Record it in your inventory anyway so you can show your reasoning. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this technology alone. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Google Analytics, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Google Analytics use AI?** Google Analytics is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. **Does Google Analytics create an EU AI Act obligation?** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this technology alone. --- # Is Segment EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-segment-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Segment EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Segment use AI? Segment is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. Record it in your inventory anyway so you can show your reasoning. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this technology alone. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Segment, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Segment use AI?** Segment is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. **Does Segment create an EU AI Act obligation?** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this technology alone. --- # Is Cloudflare EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-cloudflare-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Cloudflare EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Cloudflare use AI? Cloudflare is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. Record it in your inventory anyway so you can show your reasoning. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **Typical role under the Act:** unknown. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this technology alone. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Cloudflare, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Cloudflare use AI?** Cloudflare is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. **Does Cloudflare create an EU AI Act obligation?** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this technology alone. --- # Is nginx EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-nginx-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is nginx EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does nginx use AI? nginx is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. Record it in your inventory anyway so you can show your reasoning. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **Typical role under the Act:** unknown. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this technology alone. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for nginx, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does nginx use AI?** nginx is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. **Does nginx create an EU AI Act obligation?** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this technology alone. --- # Is WordPress EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-wordpress-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is WordPress EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does WordPress use AI? WordPress is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. Record it in your inventory anyway so you can show your reasoning. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **Typical role under the Act:** unknown. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this technology alone. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for WordPress, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does WordPress use AI?** WordPress is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. **Does WordPress create an EU AI Act obligation?** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this technology alone. --- # Is Shopify EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-shopify-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Shopify EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Shopify use AI? Shopify is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. Record it in your inventory anyway so you can show your reasoning. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this technology alone. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Shopify, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Shopify use AI?** Shopify is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. **Does Shopify create an EU AI Act obligation?** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this technology alone. --- # Is Webflow EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-webflow-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Webflow EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Webflow use AI? Webflow is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. Record it in your inventory anyway so you can show your reasoning. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this technology alone. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Webflow, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Webflow use AI?** Webflow is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. **Does Webflow create an EU AI Act obligation?** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this technology alone. --- # Is Mailchimp EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-mailchimp-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Mailchimp EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Mailchimp use AI? Mailchimp is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. Record it in your inventory anyway so you can show your reasoning. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this technology alone. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Mailchimp, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Mailchimp use AI?** Mailchimp is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. **Does Mailchimp create an EU AI Act obligation?** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this technology alone. --- # Is Stripe EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/tools/is-stripe-eu-ai-act-compliant # Is Stripe EU AI Act compliant? (Article 50, 2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** AIActEasy maps publicly known product behaviour to the EU AI Act; confirm the specifics with the vendor and your own counsel. ## Does Stripe use AI? Stripe is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. Record it in your inventory anyway so you can show your reasoning. ## Which EU AI Act obligation applies? This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement. **Your likely obligation:** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **Typical role under the Act:** deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly. ## What's the risk? No transparency gap from this technology alone. ## How to prove compliance Keep an inventory entry for Stripe, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator. ## Frequently asked questions **Does Stripe use AI?** Stripe is not primarily an AI system, so it does not by itself create Article 50 duties. **Does Stripe create an EU AI Act obligation?** No specific Art.50 transparency obligation triggered. **What is the risk if I ignore it?** No transparency gap from this technology alone. --- # EU AI Act Article 50 explained: transparency obligations (2026) Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/article-50 # EU AI Act Article 50 explained: transparency obligations (2026) > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** Confirm the specifics for your situation with qualified counsel. Article 50 of the EU AI Act sets the transparency duties that apply to AI systems which interact with people or generate content. It is one of the obligations that starts applying on 2 August 2026, and it reaches far more ordinary businesses than the high-risk rules do — any website with an AI chatbot or AI-generated content is in scope. ## Who Article 50 applies to Article 50 binds both providers (those who build and place an AI system on the market) and deployers (those who use one under their own authority). Most companies are deployers: you did not build the chatbot, but you put it on your website, so the user-facing disclosure duty is yours. The obligation follows the actual use, not the size of the company — there is no small-business exemption from the transparency rules. ## The four transparency cases Article 50 has four limbs. (1) AI systems that interact with people must let those people know they are dealing with an AI, unless it is obvious. (2) Providers of generative AI must mark synthetic audio, image, video or text as artificially generated in a machine-readable way. (3) Emotion-recognition and biometric-categorisation systems must inform the people exposed to them. (4) Deployers of deep fakes must disclose that the content is artificially generated or manipulated, and AI-generated text published to inform the public on matters of public interest must be disclosed as such. ## The 2 August 2026 deadline The Article 50 transparency obligations become enforceable on 2 August 2026. After that date a regulator — or a customer running a procurement check — can ask you to show that every AI touchpoint a user meets is disclosed. The practical task is to inventory where AI appears on your site, add the disclosures, and keep dated evidence that you did. --- # EU AI Act deadlines: the full compliance timeline Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/eu-ai-act-deadlines # EU AI Act deadlines: the full compliance timeline > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** Confirm the specifics for your situation with qualified counsel. The EU AI Act does not switch on all at once. It entered into force on 1 August 2024 and phases in over three years. Knowing which deadline catches your business is the difference between a calm rollout and a scramble. ## The phased timeline Entry into force: 1 August 2024. Prohibited AI practices and the AI-literacy duty: 2 February 2025. Obligations for general-purpose AI models and the governance framework: 2 August 2025. The bulk of the Act — Article 50 transparency duties and the high-risk obligations for Annex III systems: 2 August 2026. High-risk AI embedded in products already covered by EU product-safety law (Annex I): 2 August 2027. ## Which deadline catches most companies For the typical SaaS company or online business, the date that matters is 2 August 2026. That is when the Article 50 transparency obligations apply — and almost every site with an AI chatbot, AI search, or AI-generated marketing content is touched by those. The high-risk regime is narrower and reaches fewer ordinary businesses, but the transparency rules are broad. ## What to do before 2 August 2026 Build an inventory of the AI systems you deploy, classify each one against Article 50, add the user-facing disclosures where they apply, and keep dated proof. Treat it as an ongoing record rather than a one-off project: new tools get added to your stack constantly, and each one needs the same quick check. --- # Provider vs deployer under the EU AI Act: which are you? Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/provider-vs-deployer # Provider vs deployer under the EU AI Act: which are you? > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** Confirm the specifics for your situation with qualified counsel. The EU AI Act assigns obligations by role, not by industry. The two roles you most often take on are provider and deployer, and which one you are determines what the law asks of you. Most businesses are deployers of someone else’s AI. ## What a provider is A provider develops an AI system (or has one developed) and places it on the market or puts it into service under its own name or trademark. Providers carry the heaviest obligations: conformity assessment for high-risk systems, technical documentation, and — for generative AI — marking outputs as artificially generated. If you build and sell an AI product, you are a provider. ## What a deployer is A deployer uses an AI system under its own authority in the course of its activity. If you embed a third-party chatbot on your website or use an AI writing tool to produce content, you are a deployer. Deployers carry the user-facing transparency duties under Article 50 — telling people they are interacting with AI, and disclosing deep-fake or AI-generated public-interest content. ## Why the distinction matters You can be both at once: a provider of your own AI feature and a deployer of several third-party tools. The obligations stack. Getting the role right for each system tells you exactly which duties apply, and it is the first thing a regulator or a procurement reviewer will want to see you have reasoned through. --- # AI transparency obligations under the EU AI Act Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/ai-transparency-obligations # AI transparency obligations under the EU AI Act > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** Confirm the specifics for your situation with qualified counsel. Transparency is the obligation most businesses will meet first under the EU AI Act. It is not about proving your AI is safe — it is about being honest that AI is involved. This guide covers what you must disclose and how. ## Disclosing AI interaction When a person interacts with an AI system — a chatbot, a voice assistant, an AI agent — they must be told, clearly and at first contact, unless it is already obvious. A simple, accessible line such as “You’re chatting with an AI assistant” satisfies this for most websites. The disclosure should be perceivable to everyone, which is where accessibility (WCAG) and the AI Act overlap. ## Labelling AI-generated content Synthetic media — AI-generated images, audio, video and, in defined cases, text — must be marked as artificially generated. Providers of generative systems carry the machine-readable marking duty; deployers who publish deep fakes or AI-generated public-interest text carry a visible disclosure duty. In practice that means a label users can see and, increasingly, metadata machines can read. ## Keeping proof Transparency is only worth anything if you can show it. Capture the disclosure each system presents, record where it is used, and date the record. When a customer’s procurement team asks you to “prove you comply with the AI Act”, that dated inventory is the answer — and it is far easier to maintain continuously than to reconstruct under pressure. --- # The EU AI Act for SaaS companies: a practical guide Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/ai-act-for-saas # The EU AI Act for SaaS companies: a practical guide > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** Confirm the specifics for your situation with qualified counsel. Most SaaS companies assume the EU AI Act is about high-risk systems and does not touch them. The transparency rules tell a different story: if your product or marketing site uses an AI chatbot or AI-generated content, you are in scope from 2 August 2026. ## Where SaaS products meet the Act Three places, usually. First, the support chatbot — almost always an AI deployment that needs an interaction disclosure. Second, AI features inside the product (AI search, summaries, recommendations) which need to be inventoried and, where they generate content, labelled. Third, the marketing site itself, if it publishes AI-generated copy or media. None of these are high-risk, but all are caught by Article 50. ## Why it shows up in sales Even before enforcement, the AI Act shows up in procurement. Enterprise buyers increasingly ask vendors to confirm AI Act readiness in security and compliance questionnaires. A clear, dated answer — “here is every AI touchpoint, here is the disclosure, here is the date” — removes friction from the sale. A vague answer slows the deal. ## A practical checklist Inventory every AI system you build or deploy. Classify each against Article 50. Add an interaction disclosure to any AI a user talks to. Label AI-generated content. Write down your reasoning for the systems you decided are out of scope. Keep it all dated and reviewable. That is a defensible compliance position you can build in days, not months. --- # AI chatbot disclosure under the EU AI Act Source: https://aiacteasy.com/ai-act/ai-chatbot-disclosure # AI chatbot disclosure under the EU AI Act > **This is an informational estimate, not legal advice.** Confirm the specifics for your situation with qualified counsel. The website chatbot is the single most common AI deployment, and it is squarely inside Article 50’s first transparency case. If users can talk to an AI on your site, you owe them a disclosure — and it is one of the easiest obligations to satisfy. ## What Article 50(1) requires When a person interacts with an AI system they must be informed of that fact, in a clear and timely way, unless it is obvious to a reasonably well-informed person. For a chatbot that can be mistaken for a human agent, it is not obvious — so the disclosure is required. The bar is honesty at first contact, not a legal essay. ## What good disclosure looks like A short, visible line at the start of the conversation: “You’re chatting with an AI assistant. Ask to speak to a person any time.” Make it perceivable to assistive technology too — the AI Act expects disclosures to reach everyone, which aligns with WCAG accessibility. Avoid burying it in a privacy policy; the disclosure should be where the interaction happens. ## The deadline and the proof This obligation is enforceable from 2 August 2026. To be ready, confirm the disclosure is present and accessible, screenshot it, and date the record. If you swap chatbot vendors, repeat the quick check. That small, repeatable habit is what keeps you continuously compliant rather than scrambling before an audit.