Does Sourcegraph Cody use AI?
Sourcegraph Cody ships AI-driven features, so it falls inside the scope of the EU AI Act's transparency rules. That does not automatically make you non-compliant — it means there is a disclosure obligation to check and, if it applies, to satisfy.
Which EU AI Act obligation applies?
This technology does not, on its own, trigger an Article 50 transparency obligation — but you should still record it in your AI inventory so you can prove that conclusion in procurement.
Your likely obligation: AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory.
Typical role under the Act: deployer. Providers build and place the system on the market; deployers use it under their own authority — your obligations differ accordingly.
What's the risk?
No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code.
How to prove compliance
Keep an inventory entry for Sourcegraph Cody, record where it is used, capture the disclosure you show end-users, and date it. That auditable trail is what answers a "prove you comply" request in procurement or from a regulator.
Frequently asked questions
Does Sourcegraph Cody use AI?
Yes — Sourcegraph Cody ships AI-driven features, which is why it falls inside the EU AI Act's transparency scope.
Does Sourcegraph Cody create an EU AI Act obligation?
AI coding assistant — internal tool, no end-user Art.50 disclosure, but record it in your AI inventory.
What is the risk if I ignore it?
No end-user transparency gap; review IP/licensing of generated code.